Page 10 of 103

Re: Submachine 9 theories and suggestions

Posted: 28 Dec 2012 03:51
by Oleander
Well, taking the world of Submachine to be mostly like the real world, wouldn't that be what it is canonically, since he can (I think) teleport and stuff with it?

Re: Submachine 9 theories and suggestions

Posted: 28 Dec 2012 04:17
by The Kakama
Maybe,but I don't think the submachine is quite like the real world,it's physics seem so much more easier to manipulate.Either that,or some unknown force was applied when mur used his karma arm.But that wouldn't explain the bells/ancient section.

Re: Submachine 9 theories and suggestions

Posted: 28 Dec 2012 20:14
by WorldisQuiet5256
WorldisQuiet5256 wrote:
Yet we can't confirm or denied other possible Question we been asking about the Submachine games since we started playing it, even half the Answer that are presented bring more Questions that we have yet to Answer.

The Focus part is so far anything, if not to me suggest, he is Autistic. You have no idea how much an Autistic Person can Focus, do you?

I do, so I stand by my Theory until we've met Murtaugh in person or seen some Recording of him talking, until then, there are endless possibility and the one I pick is he is Autistic.

FYI I can see more going on in a room then most people think, I can literately see the Atoms that make up a Book collide with the Atoms on a Desk when it is slammed down onto the Desk. I can see every Function, every Piece, every Part that contributes to the continuous motion that drives the Universe, and all within it.

Minds such as Mine are without Boarders, that such as the ones that tie your Minds down. Projecting a Narrow Perspective just because you FEEL that whatever the Answer is, it not that Idea. That exact Consciences Brain which resides in your Skull.

I would appreciate you not being condescending towards me and other members. You're projecting a far more narrow perspective than anyone else is by completely refusing to consider the possibility that your theory might be inaccurate. You're being really disrespectful towards everyone else in this thread right now and it's totally uncalled for.
My most Sincere Apology.

I live in a Small Town, has a lot of great perks. But one that insistent is the lack of Intelligent that I look for that matches my own. This Forum is the only place where I can discuss my thoughts about Materusz Great Art.

Again, Sorry.

Re: Submachine 9 theories and suggestions

Posted: 28 Dec 2012 21:20
by Rooster5man
So,following on your theory,his karma arm is some kind of device that can bend space.
As Taalit said, while that is the general assumption, that's not what my Theory's pointing out.

I was saying that the Subbots attempted to repair the arm that he "lost" (which we're still not sure on the full story, unless it really is that he was on a camping trip and lost his arm), and gave him this "Karma Arm." This was going off the idea from the Doctor Who episode I mentioned where these sub-atomic robots repaired limbs - In this case, repairing the limb in a way the Subbots think is best.

Re: Submachine 9 theories and suggestions

Posted: 28 Dec 2012 21:24
by WorldisQuiet5256
Really...?

Re: Submachine 9 theories and suggestions

Posted: 28 Dec 2012 21:26
by Rooster5man
Really what? It's an idea, I can accept if it's wrong (which it most likely is), I'm just throwing around ideas.

Re: Submachine 9 theories and suggestions

Posted: 28 Dec 2012 22:14
by WorldisQuiet5256
Wow! You weren't paying attention.

Then again...no surprise.

Re: Submachine 9 theories and suggestions

Posted: 28 Dec 2012 22:16
by Redafro
Dude, don't be an ass.
Edit: Rooster is one of the sharpest dudes on the forum, and pays very close attention. Now Worldisquiet, I've enjoyed a few of your discussions and theories, but I wouldn't say you pay as close attention as rooster. So please, don't get arrogant unless you demonstration the capacity to back it.

Re: Submachine 9 theories and suggestions

Posted: 28 Dec 2012 22:24
by Rooster5man
Thanks, Red, but I really don't want this to devolve into a meaningless discussion.

I've been taught "If you have nothing nice to say, don't say it at all." I'm not going to be arrogant and say "I accept your apology" because the fact of the matter is I disagreed with how Taalit's point of view on what you said, and we've discussed how I would've taken a different approach and he's completely fine with it. So for me to accept an apology which wasn't called for is un-necessary.

I read your apology, but to say "Apology accepted" when it's not called for is pointless, so I decided to stick to a more appropriate discussion, being this IS "Submachine 9 Theories and Suggestions."

Re: Submachine 9 theories and suggestions

Posted: 28 Dec 2012 22:28
by Redafro
Rooster5man wrote:Thanks, Red, but I really don't want this to devolve into a meaningless discussion.
I've been taught "If you have nothing nice to say, don't say it at all."
True that. So, Worldisquiet, I apologize. Your comment rubbed me the wrong way, but I agree with rooster that I don't want discussions on this forum to turn ugly and meaningless. So I apologize. Please continue the discussion in a civil way.