Boingo's theories
Re: The Physics of the Subnet
Ha!
The Thread is revived!
Oh, poop, gotta go.
The Thread is revived!
Oh, poop, gotta go.
Re: The Physics of the Subnet
Now, this is on a new topic, but has it ever occurred to anyone that the last beamer in Sub 8 in (layer 7) was to "open" layer 1?
- Anteroinen
- subnet traveller
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012 18:43
- Location: Finland
Re: The Physics of the Subnet
Yes, although that wasn't the case. It opened the door in layer 5.
"We didn't leave the Stone Age, because we ran out of stones."
Re: The Physics of the Subnet
So if one was to play it and not activate the beamer the layer five door wouldn't work?
Oh well. Worth a try.
Oh well. Worth a try.
Boingo's theories
To start: has anyone read the book series 'The Laws of Magic' by Michael Pryor?
- Sublevel 114
- layer restorer
- Posts: 16587
- Joined: 11 Dec 2012 20:23
Re: Just a thing about Dimensions...
No, I didn't.
Re: Just a thing about Dimensions...
Sorry, I just had to write that in a moment of hurry.
Anyway, he wrote a thing about dimensions that I found interesting. Now, I have no idea how it could apply anywhere in the Submachine, but...
So we have our standard three dimensions of direction. (Yes, the title may have been misleading :/ )
Length, width and depth.
The most common representation of them is a cube. Imagine it.
Now turn it so that you can only see one face of your cube. Suddenly, you can only see an area, which is two dimensional, a square. Now if we turn this square around 90 degrees so that we can only see the edge of it (A line) we appear to have taken it down by one more dimension again.
Finally, by turning this line one more time, it has become a dot, practically invisible.
Pryor suggests within his book that you can effectively fold a three dimensional shape like that into a no dimensional space...
...I'll draw it up and take a picture, and put it on here.
Anyway, he wrote a thing about dimensions that I found interesting. Now, I have no idea how it could apply anywhere in the Submachine, but...
So we have our standard three dimensions of direction. (Yes, the title may have been misleading :/ )
Length, width and depth.
The most common representation of them is a cube. Imagine it.
Now turn it so that you can only see one face of your cube. Suddenly, you can only see an area, which is two dimensional, a square. Now if we turn this square around 90 degrees so that we can only see the edge of it (A line) we appear to have taken it down by one more dimension again.
Finally, by turning this line one more time, it has become a dot, practically invisible.
Pryor suggests within his book that you can effectively fold a three dimensional shape like that into a no dimensional space...
...I'll draw it up and take a picture, and put it on here.
Re: Just a thing about Dimensions...
Bump.
Sorry, I just want a reply not just being a pain.
Sorry, I just want a reply not just being a pain.
Re: Just a thing about Dimensions...
you mean like this?
I thought about it when I was little. I didn't know it was in a book
I thought about it when I was little. I didn't know it was in a book
Re: Just a thing about Dimensions...
Yeah, like that.
It's mathematically possible, but with current knowledge of how dimensions work, it's obviously not viable...
It'd have to include folding these bits away into parallel dimensions...hmm.
Nice thought though.
It's mathematically possible, but with current knowledge of how dimensions work, it's obviously not viable...
It'd have to include folding these bits away into parallel dimensions...hmm.
Nice thought though.