Pastelland Forum

We all have theories to share, WorldisQuiet5256, what's your point? That's the fun of being on this Forum.

Thank you!

I'm currently writing another theory called Karmic Flora and Fauna Theory.

You're welcome!

I would take another glance at the Wiki just to be sure that hasn't been taken - Pretty sure that Cone wrote a Theory similar in nature to that subject. (Life Energy Theory)

I'll take a look at it to make sure it's not the same thing.

No problem.

We all have theories to share, WorldisQuiet5256, what's your point? That's the fun of being on this Forum.

I could say it strait to your face and you still wouldn't understand me.

I'll take a look at it to make sure it's not the same thing.

So you admit your being Redundant when making these Theories.

Well, then, try. And if I don't understand, we'll leave it at that - I don't want to spam Abacus's thread.

So you admit your being Redundant when making these Theories

How is he being redundant? Sure, the Ancient Computer seemed theorized already, but Portal Mechanics is original. And why does it matter to you about what he theorizes? Let him make his theories.

Who says I'm stopping him. I want to hear what he has to say.

I kept on forgetting to get back to this.

So you admit your being Redundant when making these Theories.

That's not redundancy. A theory would only be redundant if it was already written before. If that is the case, then yes, it would be redundant a theory that has already been written.

I would take another glance at the Wiki just to be sure that hasn't been taken - Pretty sure that Cone wrote a Theory similar in nature to that subject. (Life Energy Theory)

I checked a while ago, it was pretty similar to what I had in mind. I only had an expansion of that theory.

I made the discussion about the "architects" being a metaphor into a theory:

“The Architects” is a Metaphor (Conspiracy) Theory
One could infer that whatever/whoever created or is the subnet is the "architects." I never looked at that last part literally, simply because the idea that such a major part of the subnet was created solely by people is not very appealing to me (nor did that thought ever enter my mind). We must be very careful not to confuse something metaphorical as literal, vice versa. In the sub9 theories and suggestions on the old forum there quite a few pages on the note with the mention of Alexander and a knot. If I recall correctly it turned out to be a reference to the about Alexander the Great and the Gordian Knot. This: "who needs god when you have architects like that?" is, after all, a rhetorical question, so we must be more careful in deciding whether the mention of architects is only a metaphor or not.



Not too long ago, I had an idea about karma energy being the utilisation of quantum mechanics. Unfortunately I don't know enough on the subject to write a theory about it. And after all, no one has really understood quantum mechanics in the first place, so it will take a while to write the theory.

The Abacus wrote:I kept on forgetting to get back to this.

I would take another glance at the Wiki just to be sure that hasn't been taken - Pretty sure that Cone wrote a Theory similar in nature to that subject. (Life Energy Theory)

I checked a while ago, it was pretty similar to what I had in mind. I only had an expansion of that theory.

I made the discussion about the "architects" being a metaphor into a theory:

“The Architects” is a Metaphor (Conspiracy) Theory
One could infer that whatever/whoever created or is the subnet is the "architects." I never looked at that last part literally, simply because the idea that such a major part of the subnet was created solely by people is not very appealing to me (nor did that thought ever enter my mind). We must be very careful not to confuse something metaphorical as literal, vice versa. In the sub9 theories and suggestions on the old forum there quite a few pages on the note with the mention of Alexander and a knot. If I recall correctly it turned out to be a reference to the about Alexander the Great and the Gordian Knot. This: "who needs god when you have architects like that?" is, after all, a rhetorical question, so we must be more careful in deciding whether the mention of architects is only a metaphor or not.

Not too long ago, I had an idea about karma energy being the utilisation of quantum mechanics. Unfortunately I don't know enough on the subject to write a theory about it. And after all, no one has really understood quantum mechanics in the first place, so it will take a while to write the theory.

Absolutely fine you didn't come back to it

What was the expansion to Cone's Theory?

Architects: I would say Still Alive edging Doubtful, I truly believe Mateusz meant "architects" in plain english. We, after all, are human, we could probably say Mur and Liz are as well, so should the Architects. Unless the "architect" was something along the lines of the Big Bang Theory, which I somewhat doubt, but I'll keep that thought alive.

Yeah, I'm not too sure on quantum either...XD Is that something to do with the Time/Space aspect of Mur's Karma arm? It's very possible you're right.

What was the expansion to Cone's Theory?

Karmic Flora and Fauna

Unless the "architect" was something along the lines of the Big Bang Theory, which I somewhat doubt, but I'll keep that thought alive.

I don't understand how the Big Bang Theory us relavant...XD

Is that something to do with the Time/Space aspect of Mur's Karma arm? It's very possible you're right.

It would at least explain the karma portals. XD

Karmic Flora and Fauna

Oh, I see.

I don't understand how the Big Bang Theory us relavant...XD

Creationism v. The Big Bang Theory.

The "architect," instead of being god (as is the basis of Creationism), is instead the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang Theory created The Plan, or something like the Big Bang Theory - The creation of the SubNet.

It would at least explain the karma portals. XD

I guess Quantum Mechanics may be going too far, but who knows XD