Pastelland Forum

I noticed a discrepancy between sub5HD and sub6HD, the mover's appearance is improved in sub5HD and remains the same in sub6HD, so when you play them in sequence the difference is noticeable.

Lol, did you notice different portal beams in Sub6 ending and Sub7 beginnig?
;)

yes, that too

Those kind of continuity errors are the reason I prefer original version than HD versions. I think Sublevel agrees too.

ENIHCAMBUS wrote:I think Sublevel agrees too.

agree. But only because originals are BETTER than remakes.

"continuity errors" are present in both versions.

ENIHCAMBUS wrote:Those kind of continuity errors are the reason I prefer original version than HD versions. I think Sublevel agrees too.

but there are errors in both versions, like Sublevel says. some other continuity errors are actually fixed in the HD versions.

and the others will be prbably fixed by the time of the bundle.

Vortex wrote:I noticed a discrepancy between sub5HD and sub6HD, the mover's appearance is improved in sub5HD and remains the same in sub6HD, so when you play them in sequence the difference is noticeable.

Sub5 HD has improved graphics – I think that's enough to make up for the continuity errors.

Speaking of which, why didn't Mateusz improve the graphics for Sub4 and 2? I know he's busy, but I think a lot more people would buy the game if he improved them. Just look at the graphics of his more recent games and compare to the older ones: the difference is immense. What's especially odd is that they're all (except Sub9) being sold at the same price. (I've been wondering about this for a long time...)

yeah, I was wondering that too. it's possibe that he lacked the time to do it.

The Abacus wrote:why didn't Mateusz improve the graphics for Sub4 and 2?

and 2

wait, isn't Sub2HD the same as Sub2: Revisited that has improved graphics?

no, graphics have not changed much (aside from very concrete things). at least that's my impression. it's identical to the low HD version, you can just play it in higher resolution.