Discuss the Avatar

User avatar
RuloCore
subnet notes finder
Posts: 802
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:32
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Contact:

Re: Discuss the Avatar

Post by RuloCore »

Vurn wrote:
OnyxIonVortex wrote:It's not about being *logical* or anything. It's about everyone using the same kind of format to avoid confusion.
RuloCore wrote:But isn't it more logical as we do, from less to more time range?
First the day, then the month and then the year.
Hello Logic?
When you write a number like 1792, the base value of each digit is decreasing. As in, the 1 at the beginning means a thousand, while 2 at the end means just two. How is that logical?
Forget the base values, 1792 years is more than 27 days. There are 12 different 27ths, one for every month, and there are infinite februaries, one for every year. So, days belong to months, who belong to years. dd/mm/yyyy. From less time ranges to more (a day is shorter than a month which is shorter than a year). We can establish relations between these time periods, but if we did for "1792" (numbers) we would need to say: "2 of the ninth ten of the seventh hundreds of the first thousand" (well, in spanish this example is more effective, because packs of 10 and 100 have different language terminations than the numbers 10 and 100). So, that's why for numbers is better put it as you said, but with dates is easier: "this day of this month of this year".
User avatar
Anteroinen
subnet traveller
Posts: 1341
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 18:43
Location: Finland

Re: Discuss the Avatar

Post by Anteroinen »

I meant that since we read from left to right in most countries, the first thing we see has more impact in the eye. But the effect is minimal.
Oh, you always write 1.3.2013 then?
"We didn't leave the Stone Age, because we ran out of stones."
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12141
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: Discuss the Avatar

Post by Vortex »

Anteroinen wrote:Oh, you always write 1.3.2013 then?
Yes... why?
User avatar
Vurn
subnet traveller
Posts: 1026
Joined: 04 Dec 2012 19:11
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: Discuss the Avatar

Post by Vurn »

OnyxIonVortex wrote: Anyways, it's not likely that people will follow it, because they aren't used to it and wouldn't want to change their way of writing, and because it was meant as an international standard for organizations rather than for general use.
Pretty sure all computer clocks use it. And I started using it too :P
TT: I guess one could use those words to describe it.
TT: If armed with a predilection for the inapt.
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12141
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: Discuss the Avatar

Post by Vortex »

Vurn wrote:
OnyxIonVortex wrote: Anyways, it's not likely that people will follow it, because they aren't used to it and wouldn't want to change their way of writing, and because it was meant as an international standard for organizations rather than for general use.
Pretty sure all computer clocks use it. And I started using it too :P
Yeah, computers use it because sorting by alphabetical order is made easier (thanks Wikipedia!). And I don't negate the usefulness of having a convention when talking to people from different countries.
But if for example I go to a friend of mine and try to convince him of the benefits of putting the dates in reverse, I could tell where would he send me XD
User avatar
Anteroinen
subnet traveller
Posts: 1341
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 18:43
Location: Finland

Re: Discuss the Avatar

Post by Anteroinen »

OnyxIonVortex wrote:
Anteroinen wrote:Oh, you always write 1.3.2013 then?
Yes... why?
Seriously? You never use 1.3? What is this madness?
Pretty sure all computer clocks use it.
In the software I presume?
"We didn't leave the Stone Age, because we ran out of stones."
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12141
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: Discuss the Avatar

Post by Vortex »

Anteroinen wrote:
OnyxIonVortex wrote:
Anteroinen wrote:Oh, you always write 1.3.2013 then?
Yes... why?
Seriously? You never use 1.3? What is this madness?
Why is that so strange? XD

Anteroinen wrote:
Pretty sure all computer clocks use it.
In the software I presume?
Yeah, it's built into the command windows and such.
User avatar
Anteroinen
subnet traveller
Posts: 1341
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 18:43
Location: Finland

Re: Discuss the Avatar

Post by Anteroinen »

OnyxIonVortex wrote:
Anteroinen wrote:Seriously? You never use 1.3? What is this madness?
Why is that so strange? XD
Because that is almost never done in here, at least in casual contexts. That is, people usually omit the year.
"We didn't leave the Stone Age, because we ran out of stones."
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12141
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: Discuss the Avatar

Post by Vortex »

Well, here we don't omit the year so often, and when we do we just say/write it in complete form, like "the 18 of June".

EDIT: man we're so off-topic :P
User avatar
Vurn
subnet traveller
Posts: 1026
Joined: 04 Dec 2012 19:11
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: Discuss the Avatar

Post by Vurn »

It's General Discussion. We're allowed to be off topic here.
TT: I guess one could use those words to describe it.
TT: If armed with a predilection for the inapt.
Post Reply