The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation
Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation
Wait
Peter Navarre Crecy
Peter Navarre Crecy
PNC
PNC = point 'n click
PNC evaluation = Point 'n click evaluation
The game was created to test how good Game Maker is
This game isn't canon
it's a giant meta joke
bam
Peter Navarre Crecy
Peter Navarre Crecy
PNC
PNC = point 'n click
PNC evaluation = Point 'n click evaluation
The game was created to test how good Game Maker is
This game isn't canon
it's a giant meta joke
bam
Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation
confirmed
please say it is so
please say it is so
Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation
seriously...?
XD
XD
- MateuszSkutnik
- The Architect
- Posts: 806
- Joined: 20 Nov 2012 18:03
Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation
Great deduction. Respect. Here, have a cookie.Apocrypha wrote:PNC evaluation = Point 'n click evaluation
The game was created to test how good Game Maker is.
How did you arrive at that conclusion is beyond me. Gimme that cookie back.Apocrypha wrote: This game isn't canon - it's a giant meta joke
Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation
I have to imagine yet how much Kilo cookies I got to send you o.oMateuszSkutnik wrote:Great deduction. Respect. Here, have a cookie.Apocrypha wrote:PNC evaluation = Point 'n click evaluation
The game was created to test how good Game Maker is.
How did you arrive at that conclusion is beyond me. Gimme that cookie back.Apocrypha wrote: This game isn't canon - it's a giant meta joke
Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation
In the absence of an actual answer to my question about canonicity, yes, I thought I would have a bit of fun. I now know not to ask direct simple questions to help us find answers in the future.
Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation
Don't think you are putsmarting the skutnik I know ya are close
Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation
...I'm not trying to "outsmart" Mateusz, just asking a simple question, seeing him evade an answer, and then deciding to have a bit of fun.Ko9 wrote:Don't think you are putsmarting the skutnik I know ya are close
My apologies if I'm coming across as someone who's tired of getting more and more pieces of this puzzle without any actual meaningful connections. I'm tired of playing the developer. I just want to play games that make sense.
Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation
Eh. I don't blame you. But some aspects should be considered. Although the game isn't canonical, it can still help us in our studies. How? That is for every individual who reads this to figure out for themselves.
That being said, I do hope for a game to reveal certain questions I have. (one of which I have already asked Mateusz)
That being said, I do hope for a game to reveal certain questions I have. (one of which I have already asked Mateusz)
BACK TO THEORIES