Not exactly. The important thing is not the formula, letters are just placeholders. The important thing is the solving problems process, you might not remember the formula but you would know how to solve a problem. You don't even have to define the underlying concepts, you don't even have to know what velocity is, though it helps to solve problems, but it isn't completely necessary. Like how to do P.E. you don't need to know what a muscle is, though it helps.borys610 wrote:And to be honest, I hate memorizing, but it is impossible to learn anything without it. Understanding is more important, and the most important is ability to use your knowledge, when it is needed.
like this:
1-memorizing-simple science/physics formula - s:t=V
2-understanding - Why is it like this? What does it mean? How can we use it?
3-using - in real life calculating speed of something
You cant do anything without remembering formula.
And it is like this in almost every subject.
Including learning languages.
Excluding p-e.
At least that's my view, for example I have bad memory for formulas but I am skilled in the process of deducing them, so I never study for Physics exams or Maths exams but I always get a 10/10, when I need some specific formula I deduce it.
This is... err... I remember there were two types of memory, the events memory and the process memory. This would be the second one, and it's all that one needs most of the time, at least with this kind of subjects.
For other things (vocabulary, names, dates...) only the event memory works because there's no process involved.