RANDOMNESS
Re: RANDOMNESS
Yeah, we both already passed 6666, it wasn't that bad
Re: RANDOMNESS
RANDOM PHYSICS FACTS INCOMING
CTC stands for closed timelike curve, a kind of "loop" in spacetime. If objects follow this curve they end up at the same point in spacetime (not just space) that they started from. The estimated number of stars in the observable universe is thought to be of the order of 10^22 to 10^24. A stable nucleus has less rest energy than its separated constituents (in relativity, the rest energy of a system is its mass). You have to spend energy to separate the protons and neutrons inside a nucleus, and that energy is what makes for the difference in mass. By Bell's theorem, local hidden variable theories are inconsistent with quantum mechanics (unless you give up experimenter freedom, as in superdeterministic theories). The Standard Model only includes left-handed neutrinos. For the Higgs field to give a Dirac mass term to the neutrino, you need (sterile) right-handed neutrinos, not part of the model. You know how a vector doesn't change its length no matter how you rotate it? The same happens if you define the "spacetime length" c2 dt2 - dx2, where dt is the time spent travelling and dx the distance travelled. This length doesn't change no matter how you transform your reference frame. This is a property of spacetime in special relativity (called Minkowski spacetime). It turns out that in a general relativistic rotating universe there are some trajectories that travel back in time (interestingly this solution was found by Kurt Gödel, the same Gödel that proved the incompleteness theorems in mathematics). There's a class of models called cyclic models, in which the universe follows an infinite series of cycles, like the ekpyrotic model. There is also an inflationary model called eternal inflation, in which the entire universe is eternally expanding, with some regions ("bubbles") stopping expansion due to quantum fluctuations, and our observable universe being part of one of those bubbles.
CTC stands for closed timelike curve, a kind of "loop" in spacetime. If objects follow this curve they end up at the same point in spacetime (not just space) that they started from. The estimated number of stars in the observable universe is thought to be of the order of 10^22 to 10^24. A stable nucleus has less rest energy than its separated constituents (in relativity, the rest energy of a system is its mass). You have to spend energy to separate the protons and neutrons inside a nucleus, and that energy is what makes for the difference in mass. By Bell's theorem, local hidden variable theories are inconsistent with quantum mechanics (unless you give up experimenter freedom, as in superdeterministic theories). The Standard Model only includes left-handed neutrinos. For the Higgs field to give a Dirac mass term to the neutrino, you need (sterile) right-handed neutrinos, not part of the model. You know how a vector doesn't change its length no matter how you rotate it? The same happens if you define the "spacetime length" c2 dt2 - dx2, where dt is the time spent travelling and dx the distance travelled. This length doesn't change no matter how you transform your reference frame. This is a property of spacetime in special relativity (called Minkowski spacetime). It turns out that in a general relativistic rotating universe there are some trajectories that travel back in time (interestingly this solution was found by Kurt Gödel, the same Gödel that proved the incompleteness theorems in mathematics). There's a class of models called cyclic models, in which the universe follows an infinite series of cycles, like the ekpyrotic model. There is also an inflationary model called eternal inflation, in which the entire universe is eternally expanding, with some regions ("bubbles") stopping expansion due to quantum fluctuations, and our observable universe being part of one of those bubbles.
- ENIHCAMBUS
- karma portal traveller
- Posts: 8653
- Joined: 04 Feb 2013 22:17
- Location: Pastel Lands.
Re: RANDOMNESS
The "bubble" thing actualy made my remind about Subnet.
I kinda approve the idea that the Universe follows an infinite series of cycles. Makes sence because in the Universe everything seems to follow one. I think cycles actualy keep the entropy in the Universe, making so it can't expand uncontrolably and rip itself.
I kinda approve the idea that the Universe follows an infinite series of cycles. Makes sence because in the Universe everything seems to follow one. I think cycles actualy keep the entropy in the Universe, making so it can't expand uncontrolably and rip itself.
ENIHCAMBUS: State of the Art Scanning!
- The Kakama
- karma portal traveller
- Posts: 6243
- Joined: 04 Dec 2012 16:35
- Location: Selangor, Malaysia
Re: RANDOMNESS
Not everything on the universe follows an infinite series of cycles, eg. the earth can only orbit the sun a finite number of times before the sun burns out.I kinda approve the idea that the Universe follows an infinite series of cycles. Makes sence because in the Universe everything seems to follow one.
Is this my final form?
- Sublevel 114
- layer restorer
- Posts: 16587
- Joined: 11 Dec 2012 20:23
Re: RANDOMNESS
посмакуем немножко
Re: RANDOMNESS
¡кáлЬатэ лЬа, пэсао!
- Sublevel 114
- layer restorer
- Posts: 16587
- Joined: 11 Dec 2012 20:23
Re: RANDOMNESS
...you will see hellish-satanic machine...
(about Lighthouse portal)
from walkthrough I used to complete Submachine 2 for first time, back in 2008...
(about Lighthouse portal)
from walkthrough I used to complete Submachine 2 for first time, back in 2008...
Re: RANDOMNESS
Hellish-satanic?
Now I'm afraid of lightbulbs...
Now I'm afraid of lightbulbs...
- ENIHCAMBUS
- karma portal traveller
- Posts: 8653
- Joined: 04 Feb 2013 22:17
- Location: Pastel Lands.
Re: RANDOMNESS
OnyxIonVortex wrote:Hellish-satanic?
Now I'm afraid of lightbulbs...
ENIHCAMBUS: State of the Art Scanning!