The Abacus' Theories

[The Abacus]

The "architect," instead of being god (as is the basis of Creationism), is instead the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang Theory created The Plan, or something like the Big Bang Theory - The creation of the SubNet.

Some stuff happened and submachine/the subnet was the result. We know there has to someone/something that's controlling or is the subnet, simply because of the defense system. I won't be saying much more than that. XD

Quantum Mechanics may be going too far, but who knows XD

In the subnet... nothing is for certain. XD

[Rooster5man]

Some stuff happened and submachine/the subnet was the result. We know there has to someone/something that's controlling or is the subnet, simply because of the defense system. I won't be saying much more than that. XD

Well, yeah, the Computer, but think about it: The Submachine was created, and so was the Plan, but it wasn't discovered until later. If your Theory is correct.

[The Abacus]

Well, yeah, the Computer, but think about it: The Submachine was created, and so was the Plan, but it wasn't discovered until later. If your Theory is correct.

That's right, but what are you trying to say?

[Rooster5man]

If your Theory is correct: "Big Bang"-type event spurred creation of the SubNet and the Plan.

If Mateusz simply gave us information, as he did with Alexander and the Gordian knot: Architects built the Plan, no "Big Bang"/Creationism behind it.

[The Abacus]

If your Theory is correct: "Big Bang"-type event spurred creation of the SubNet and the Plan.

Hmmm... True, but it could also have too smaller "big-bang"-type events. We don't if the plan was suddenly spawned by the subnet a number amount of years after coming into existence.

[Rooster5man]

Hmm, I suppose...So that's a third conclusion, or just a sub-section of the first idea (which is your idea) - Big Bang happened, second Big Bang came later.

[The Abacus]

All my theory states is that the submachine or whoever created the submachine programmed it to spawn the plan. Whether the plan created when the submachine gained the ability to do so (single big-bang) or appeared after an undefined amount of time afterwards (two smaller big-bangs) is not part of my theory.

[Rooster5man]

I understand that, but without a "God"-like figure to create the Submachine, how does this happen?

All my theory states is that the submachine or whoever created the submachine programmed it to spawn the plan.

By saying who, you contradict your Theory: The "who" would then be the "Architect."

If the Submachine itself created the Plan, then that also answers the "who" in the question "Who is the Architect?"

It's either there's a "Big Bang," meaning the SubNet was spontaneously created as well as the Plan, or Creationism, meaning the Architects built it. If Creationism is the answer, your Theory is Debunked.

[The Abacus]

My theory says that "The Architect" is a metaphor either for the creator(s) of subnet or the subnet itself (if it is sentient A.I.).

[Rooster5man]

My theory says that "The Architect" is a metaphor either for the creator(s) of subnet or the subnet itself (if it is sentient A.I.).

You didn't quite say that in your original Theory...XD

I thought you were arguing with the fact that there are no "architects" who built the Plan, as the note would imply, meaning you were theorizing that, as I said, some sort of "big bang" created the SubNet and the Plan...